November 15th, 2024
|
10
min read
It’s hard being so smart, isn’t it?
When writing about their specialist subject, I often see YouTubers struggling to decide what information is actually important for the script.
After all, you’re an expert in whatever you’re talking about. You know there’s a tonne of nuance you could put into in every video.
I’ve struggled with this feeling, too. Staring at a script, thinking:
“I can’t trim this more than I already have. Every piece of information is completely essential.”
But 99% of the time, if you feel like this… you’re wrong.
The feeling is summed up in this quote:
“Forced prioritization is really painful. Smart people recognize the value of all the material.
They see nuance, multiple perspectives - and because they fully appreciate the complexities of a situation, they're often tempted to linger there.
The tendency to gravitate towards complexity is perpetually at war with the need to prioritize.”
This is from Made to Stick, a book recommended to me by my friend Gil Hildebrand.
Never has a quote (that's NOT written about YouTube scripts) so perfectly summed up the struggle of writing YouTube scripts 😂
I often see students and clients get in their heads about some imagined critic complaining about their scripts:
“Erm, excuse me, you didn’t caveat [point X] with [point Y]!”
Gradually, they start to second-guess everything they’re writing.
And this slows their writing speed to a crawl.
But remember - you’re writing a YouTube script, not a college essay.
Yes, you should strive for accuracy and fairness in your videos.
But there will be times when certain nuances or tangents must be consciously ignored.
Made to Stick argues that we must learn to tell the difference between “critical” and “beneficial” information.
The goal is not to remove nuance completely.
It’s to accept that some level of nuance will usually need to be sacrificed, which might mean not all “beneficial” information will make the cut.
Let's look at the difference between "critical" and "beneficial" information using a practical example.
But first!
Find viral video ideas in seconds.
Get 50% Off 1of10 (forever)
Every single week, I use 1of10 to find high-performing ideas for channels I work with.
Check out this 8min video showing exactly how.
They recently added an AI thumbnail generator too (and it's surprisingly good).
So if you struggle with finding new ideas for your channel, 1of10 will make your life 10x easier.
Just use the discount code 'GEORGE50'.
To identify the difference, you need to have a clear picture of your audience avatar.
I’m still ruminating on the best way to define each term, but right now I think of it like this:
So, let’s look at “critical” and “beneficial” information in action.
Imagine an audience of coffee lovers whose primary desire to to brew strong coffee.
I’ve just written a hook for an imaginary video, but have deliberately included “beneficial” information in red.
Notice how this information still fits pretty nicely in the hook, but doesn’t appeal directly to my audience avatar:
Version 1 - with "beneficial" information left in.
Why is it so hard to brew the perfect filter coffee?
You’ve probably tried everything in the book - changing the grind size, cleaning your conical burrs and watching every James Hoffman video under the sun - but each cup still comes out weak and you can’t detect any of the interesting flavours they mentioned on the bag.
So in this video, I’m going to show you how changing the way you prep your tap water will completely alter the strength and flavour of your coffee.
It’ll take you five minutes, you won’t have to spend a penny, and you’ll be shocked that you didn’t think to try this sooner. Prepare to start making cafe-grade coffee from the comfort of your own home.
Compare this to the below rewrite where “beneficial” info is removed.
Now, the focus is on the strength of coffee, saving money and speed.
Version 2 - focused on "critical" information.
Why is it so hard to brew strong filter coffee?
You’ve probably tried everything in the book - changing the grind size, cleaning your conical burrs and watching every James Hoffman video under the sun - but each cup still comes out weak.
So in this video, I’m going to show you how changing the way you prep your tap water will completely alter the strength of your coffee - it’ll take you five minutes, you won’t have to spend a penny, and you’ll be drinking cafe-grade coffee at home for the rest of your life.
Both hooks are pretty similar, and it’s not as though the first one includes any irrelevant information.
But the key is identifying and prioritizing the “critical” information.
The one thing I want you to take away from this week’s newsletter?
Next time you realise you need to delete some “beneficial” information from your script, say to yourself:
“I am consciously removing this piece of information, and that’s alright.”
You must accept that removing a caveat here or a piece of nuance there is not only “ok”, but necessary to write a better script.
You can't go down every rabbit hole.
Focus on what your audience cares about, and prioritise creating a more memorable experience for them.
As they say in Made to Stick:
A common mistake […] is that they get so steeped in the details that they fail to see the message’s core - what readers will find important or interesting.
I’m finding this book unbelievably useful for YouTube scriptwriting and highly recommend you give it a read.
If you want to grab a copy, feel free to use my affiliate link!
That's all for this week!
But if you're locking in for a scriptwriting-centric Friday, you can also check out the latest episode of my podcast, Making It.
Any questions, just let me know!
Speak soon,
George 👋
Join 4,000+ scriptwriting nerds reading “Write On Time”. Insights from writing for multi-million subscriber YouTubers sent to your inbox every Friday.